If you are unfamiliar with what happened (a term little to disturb PB), in short, Reggie Bush was accused of receiving gifts and benefits in relation to its role as a broker at USC. He won the Heisman Trophy in 2005.
Now, after its own investigation, separate from the eyes of the NCAA, the Heisman Trust has, for the first time ever, asked for his trophy to be returned.
Now, everyone from The LA Times blog about micro-Bush (just to be on the Google Trends, nothing more) to Famecrawler Talk has something to say about it.
All, except, of course.
If Reggie Bush, what would you do in response to the news that the Heisman Trust had asked for his hard-won behind Heisman Trophy? Consider the Heisman own investigation said Bush received gifts and benefits. But none of them hit their performance in the field that earned him the 2005 Heisman.
This blogger says Bush should appeal the decision. Too many college football players are used to generate income, then forgotten. Bush should take a stand. But that's me.
Read More ->>
The former University of Southern California (USC) running back Reggie Bush be stripped of his Heisman Trophy in 2005 this month, according to a report Tuesday.
Bush became the first player in the history of 75 years of the grant to receive the dramatic penalty.
College sports governing body of the NCAA major violations found in the USC football program in June, leading to sanctions.
Two sources close to the Heisman Trophy Trust, said Yahoo! Sports that their investigation was nearing its end, and would agree with the decision of the NCAA that Bush was not eligible in 2005.
The sources said that the honor of the season may not be covered. Texas quarterback Vince Young finished second in the vote, but Bush had a huge advantage (784-79) in first-place votes.
Bush met with representatives of the reports, Heisman last month, although details of that meeting are not known.
In July, the administration announced that USC will return your copy of Bush's Heisman to trust.
Read More ->>
